Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Post Mechanical Failure Fire Damage Characterization of Graphite/Epoxy Composites



Fire damage involving mechanically failed composite aircraft structures can dramatically alter their exposed surface characteristics in ways that inhibit fire forensic analyses. In this work, the effects of fire exposure on mechanically failed Cytec T40- 800/Cycom® 5215 graphite/epoxy composites were examined. Coupon level vertical fire tests were performed on mechanically failed unnotched compression and in-plane shear graphite/epoxy specimens. The fire damage was characterized by visual inspection and scanning electron microscopy. The fire damage development in the specimens involved a concurrent and sequential interaction between multiple physical, chemical, and thermal processes. This damage included melt dripping, matrix decomposition, char, soot, matrix cracking, delamination, and residual thickness increases due to explosive outgassing. The composite thermal degradation due to heat conduction, combustion, and/or thermal deformation was significantly affected by the specimen layup, ply orientation relative to the heat source, and the fracture surface morphology. Plies burned with fibers oriented parallel to the flame axis conducted heat into the interior of the composite. This resulted in melt dripping, internal pockets of matrix decomposition, and surface char deposition that, in some cases, completely obscured pertinent aspects of fiber fracture surface morphology. In contrast, plies burned with fibers oriented perpendicular to the flame axis acted like a thermal protection layer that impeded (slowed) heat transfer to the specimen’s interior. Furthermore, the thermal damage development was influenced by the specimen layup and the total available free surface area created during mechanical failure. Specimens with more free surface area promoted better airflow and oxygen availability for combustion and sustained far more thermal degradation for given fire exposure. Key fractographic features in exposed fiber bundles were destroyed due to severe thermal oxidation and thinning. A thorough understanding of these coupon-level fire tests represents a critical first step in developing a coherent strategy for the Federal Aviation Authority post-crash forensic analysis of composite aircraft structures.


Full Text:



A. P. Mouritz, "Fire resistance of aircraft composite laminates," Journal of Materials Science

Letters, vol. 22, no. 21, pp. 1507-1509, 2003.

A. Brown, "The decomposition behavior of thermoset carbon fiber epoxy composites in the fire

environment," Sandia National Lab, Albuquerque, NM, SAND2013-1920, May 2013.

A. Brown, A. B. Dodd, and K. L. Erickson, "The behavior of carbon fiber-epoxy based aircraft

composite materials in unmitigated fires," Sandia National Lab, Albuquerque, NM, SAND2012-

, May 2012.

M. T. Wright, A. C. Luers, R. L. Darwin, J. L. Scheffey, and H. L. Bowman, "Composite materials

in aircraft mishaps involving fire: A literature review," Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons

Division, China Lake, CA, Literature review NAWCWD TP 8552, 2003.

A. P. Mouritz and A. G. Gibson, Fire properties of polymer composite materials. Springer Science

& Business Media., 2007.

Z. Zhang, "Thermo-mechanical behavior of polymer composites exposed to fire," Virginia Tech,

"Special conditions: Boeing model 787-8 airplane; composite wing and fuel tank structure-fire

protection requirements," in Federal Register, ed: Federal Aviation Administration, 2007.

C. W. Edwards, T. W. Batten, and J. E. Black, "Composite Material Hazard Assessment at Crash

Sites," School of Aerospace Medicine Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, 2015.

B. Sussholz, "Evaluation of micron size carbon fibers released from burning graphite composites,"

National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Redondo Beach, CA, NASA Contractor Report

CR-159217, 1980.

D. Stanley and A. Oztekin, "Composite failure analysis after post-crash fire," ed. Mississippi State,

Mississippi, USA, 2019.

A. P. Mouritz et al., "Review of fire structural modelling of polymer composites," Composites Part

A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 1800-1814, 2009.

J. Quintiere, R. Walters, and S. Crowley, "Flammability properties of aircraft carbon-fiber structural

composite. Final report. US Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration,"

DOT/FAA/AR-07/57, 2007.

J. Hubbard, A. Brown, A. Dodd, S. Gomez-Vasquez, and C. Ramirez, "Aircraft carbon fiber

composite characterization in adverse thermal environments: radiant heat and piloted ignition flame

spread," SAND2011-2833, 2011.

S. Eibl, "Influence of carbon fibre orientation on reaction‐ to‐ fire properties of polymer matrix

composites," Fire and materials, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 309-324, 2012.

W. Kwan, J. MacCleod, Y. Ng, and J. Tomblin, "NCAMP process specification: Fabrication of

NMS 323 qualification, equivalency, and acceptance test panels (Cytec Cycom 5215)," 2007.

E. Clarkson, "Cytec Cycom 5215 T40-800 Unitape Gr 145 33% RC Qualification Statistical

Analysis Report," 2012.

E. S. Greenhalgh, Failure analysis and fractography of polymer composites. Woodhead Publishing,

A. Horner, "Aircraft materials fire test handbook," Federal Aviation Administration., New Jersey,

Final Report DOT/FAA/AR-00/12, 2000.

P. Cahill, "An investigation of the FAA vertical Bunsen burner flammability test method," Federal

Aviation Administration, Atlantic City, NJ, DOT/FAA/CT-86/22, August 1986.

"FAA Testing Instruments." SGS Govmark Testing Services, Inc. (accessed June 25, 2021).


  • There are currently no refbacks.