Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Effect of Boundary Conditions on Process- Induced Stresses in a Plain Weave Unit Cell

K. BUKENYA, M. N. OLAYA, E. J. PINEDA, M. MAIARU

Abstract


Woven polymer matrix composites (PMCs) are leveraged in aerospace applications for their desirable specific properties, yet they are vulnerable to high residual stresses during manufacturing and their complex geometry makes experimental results difficult to observe. Process modeling is needed to characterize the effects of the curing and predict end stress states. Finite element software can be used to model woven architectures, however accurate representation of processing conditions remains a challenge when it comes to selecting boundary conditions. The effect of BCs on process-induced stress within woven PMCs is studied. The commercial Finite Element Analysis (FEA) software Abaqus is coupled with user-written subroutines in a process modeling framework. A two-dimensionally (2D) woven PMC repeating unit cell (RUC) is modeled with TexGen and Abaqus. Virtual curing is imposed on the bulk matrix. The BC study is conducted with Free, Periodic, Flat, and Flat-Free configurations. Results show that the end stress state is sensitive to the boundary condition assumptions. Flat BC results show great agreement with Periodic BCs. Residual stress results from process modeling are then compared with a linear-elastic thermal cooldown analysis in Abaqus. Cooldown results indicate an overestimation in matrix stresses compared with process modeling.


DOI
10.12783/asc36/35853

Full Text:

PDF

References


Liu, X., Furrer, D., Kosters, J., and Holmes, H., “Vision 2040: A Roadmap for Integrated, Multiscale Modeling and Simulation of Materials and Systems,” Tech. rep., NASA, Mar. 2018. URL https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20180002010 2. Guest, D. A., and Cairns, D. S. (2014). Manufacturing process modeling for composite materials and structures, Sandia blade reliability collaborative (No. SAND2014-0877). Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States); Montana State University, Bozeman, MT. 3. Gopal, A. K., Adali, S., and Verijenko, V. E. (2000). Optimal temperature profiles for minimum residual stress in the cure process of polymer composites. Composite Structures, 48(1-3), 99-106. 4. Kim, K. S., and Hahn, H. T. (1989). Residual stress development during processing of graphite/epoxy composites. Composites Science and Technology, 36(2), 121-132. 5. Heinrich, C., Aldridge, M., Wineman, A. S., Kieffer, J., Waas, A. M., and Shahwan, K. W. (2012). Generation of heat and stress during the cure of polymers used in fiber composites. International Journal of Engineering Science, 53, 85-111. 6. Baran, I., Cinar, K., Ersoy, N., Akkerman, R., and Hattel, J. H. (2017). A review on the mechanical modeling of composite manufacturing processes. Archives of computational methods in engineering, 24(2), 365-395.

Maiaru, Marianna & D'Mello, Royan & Waas, Anthony. (2018). Characterization of intralaminar strengths of virtually cured polymer matrix composites. Composites Part B: Engineering. 149. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.018.

D’Mello, R.J. & Maiarù, M. & Waas, Anthony. (2016). Virtual manufacturing of composite aerostructures. The Aeronautical Journal. 120. 61-81. 10.1017/aer.2015.19.

Tsukrov, Igor & Bayraktar, Harun & Giovinazzo, Michael & Goering, Jon & Gross, Todd & Fruscello, Monica & Martinsson, Lars. (2011). Finite Element Modeling to Predict Cure-Induced Microcracking in Three-Dimensional Woven Composites. International Journal of Fracture. 172. 10.1007/s10704-011-9659-x.

Sparkman, Daniel & Wallentine, Sarah & Flores, Mark & Wertz, John & Welter, John & Schehl, Norm & Dierken, Josiah & Zainey, David & Aldrin, John & Uchic, Mike. (2019). A supervised

learning approach for prediction of x-ray computed tomography data from ultrasonic testing data. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2102. 030002. 10.1063/1.5099748.

Chen, Y.H. & Aliabadi, M.H. (2020). Meshfree-based micromechanical modelling of twill woven composites. Composites Part B: Engineering. 197. 108190. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108190.

Ansar, Mahmood & Xinwei, Wang & Chouwei, Zhou. (2011). Modeling strategies of 3D woven composites: A review. Composite Structures - COMPOS STRUCT. 93. 1947-1963. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.03.010.

Bogdanovich, A. (2006). Multi-scale modeling, stress and failure analyses of 3-D woven composites. Journal of Materials Science. 41. 6547-6590. 10.1007/s10853-006-0197-2.

Dasgupta, A., Agarwal, R. K., & Bhandarkar, S. M. (1996). Three-dimensional modeling of woven-fabric composites for effective thermo-mechanical and thermal properties. Composites science and technology, 56(3), 209-223.

Wang, X. & Wang, X. & Zhou, Guangming & Zhou, C. (2007). Multi-scale Analyses of 3D Woven Composite Based On Periodicity Boundary Conditions. Journal of Composite Materials - J COMPOS MATER. 41. 1773-1788. 10.1177/0021998306069891.

Ullah, Zahur & Zhou, Xiaoyi & Kaczmarczyk, Lukasz & Archer, Edward & Mcilhagger, Alistair & Harkin-Jones FREng, Eileen. (2019). A unified framework for the multi-scale computational homogenisation 3D-textile composites. 167. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.03.027.

Espadas Escalante, Juan José & van Dijk, Nico & Isaksson, P. (2016). A study on the influence of boundary conditions in computational homogenization of periodic structures with application to woven composites. Composite Structures. 160. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.082.

Whitcomb, J., Kondagunta, G., & Woo, K. (1995). Boundary effects in woven composites. Journal of composite materials, 29(4), 507-524.

Kamal, Musa. (1974). Thermoset Characterization for Moldability Analysis. Polymer Engineering & Science. 14. 231 - 239. 10.1002/pen.760140312.

Jendrysik, Nadine & Schneider, Konrad & Bargmann, Swantje. (2019). Automatic generation and discretization of fully periodic representative volume elements of plain woven composites.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.